3 Reasons Why You Should Care About Quality Catalog Content in E-procurement
Procurement Trends, Source-to-Pay, E-procurement
An effective e-procurement process relies on many things, but one which cannot be ignored is the quality of your catalog content. Lack of product information, poor quality digital content, incorrect or erroneous data, etc… All contribute to potential off-contract spend and/or unnecessary product returns, extra costs and general dissatisfaction with the process.
Today I’ll be a cynic and assume no one does anything unless incentivized. I mentioned three reasons why you should care about quality catalog content – well, let’s just go straight to three KPIs your organization tracks across three stakeholder groups.
Why does quality catalog content matter for Procurement?
One of the most important KPIs for the Procurement Department is on-contract spend. Quality catalog content is not great just because the pictures look good. Procurement systems rely on
… for business users?
When talking about business users, what do they need and which KPI do they potentially impact? Business users rely on quality data at different points of the process and typically, we just take some of them for granted. Think of the search functionality – every purchasing process starts with a simple search and if the product is not easily findable via search, then we have already failed the first hurdle. But unfortunately there are no KPI related to search results, so let’s keep looking. How about Requisition to Order cycle time? How fast can you as a business user go from needing something to it being ordered? Great quality data allows your Procurement Department to automate certain purchasing channels.
… and for Finance?
If you continue little further downstream, you will find that one of the results of purchasing goods or services impacts Finance. Finance is a highly organized group and they love nothing more than automation. One of their favorite KPIs
So how does quality catalog content help here? First, quality catalog content encourages buying from the catalog rather than via free text orders (which have a much lower matching rate due to their ad-hoc nature). Second, a supplier with poor data management is likely to create situations where orders and invoices have different units of measurement, potentially different product descriptions, etc – you get the picture. Downstream in Finance, nothing is going to match and the cost to process that particular invoice is going to push all kinds of KPIs into the red.
At the end of the day, it’s all connected. Quality catalog data, the ability for the buyer to import it and use it,
Rowan has more than 10 years of experience in the purchase-to-pay arena. During this time, he has managed the go-to-market for a diverse set of portfolios including Accounts Payable Automation, B2B Networks, Financing Services, eProcurement and Product Information Management.
Read more blog posts about E-procurement
Hey CFOs - this should be important to you!
26 - 07 - 2019
The classic mistake many Nordic organizations make when digitalizing their purchase-to-pay process is starting with accounts payable.
Indirect vs Direct Procurement - who cares?
05 - 07 - 2019
Ever wonder why indirect spend get’s neglected whereas, direct spend is lavishly supported by tools, expertise and focus? Us too!
New Technology Drives E-procurement and Sourcing
21 - 05 - 2019
The hype cycle is always an interesting view of technology and the most recent report from Gartner on procurement and sourcing is no exception.
Other content you might be interested in:
Overcoming key challenges in supplier management
on demandImproving supplier engagement is a key priority for procurement. This webinar takes a practical approach to solve the supplier management challenge.