The State of E-procurement in 2017
Procurement Trends, E-procurement
What we see is that indirect procurement creates real challenges for organizations today. Managing information, supplier catalogs, spend data and supplier evaluation are all current challenges that impact the organization’s ability to provide an efficient e-purchasing process internally – and engage with suppliers externally during onboarding or sourcing events.
Collaboration between buyers and suppliers appears to be quite weak, perhaps most evident in the lack of catalogs provided by key suppliers. Complexity is clearly an issue with many in the survey giving evidence of manually maintained information, out of date information, free text ordering rather than catalog based purchasing, etc. I see this issue around managing complexity as highly interesting. It’s interesting because e-procurement has to do two things: manage complexity and present ease of use. These two things are a summary of what a vendor (like OpusCapita and others) endeavors to provide when working with an organization looking to improve their purchasing process; an Amazon-like user experience with all the information available, up-to-date and informative to the buying process. If the information is available to guide buying behavior, requisitioners will find it easier to get what they need, category managers will be able to better manage their categories and with less maverick buying, less free texting and more catalogs we begin to see more on-contract spend, managed spend and cost reduction.
Cost reduction was by far the most important single KPI and while this doesn’t surprise me greatly, it does make me view some of the responses from a perspective of ‘poor = costly’. I think Procurement (the department) has an opportunity to do more, however. Cutting costs or cost reduction is such a commoditized view of what Procurement really could do strategically for the organization.
Effective e-procurement plays a central role in sourcing, contract negotiation and, the implementation of terms which could include conditions for e-catalogs, reception of e-orders and sending of e-invoices. Procurement could also drive the supplier engagement effort around SCF programs. More and more, leading organizations are looking directly to their suppliers for collaboration (partnership even) specifically to improve processes, reduce costs and tighten supply chains. So while cost reduction is a great measure of success, I think we don’t want to lose sight of the leadership role procurement plays in the broader source-to-pay process.
Rowan Lemley has over 10 years of experience in the purchase-to-pay arena. During that time, he has lead product marketing for AP Automation, B2B networks, and most recently eProcurement and Product Information Management solutions.
Read more blog posts about E-procurement
The Future of Source-to-Pay
21 - 02 - 2020
What is the future of source-to-pay? Rowan Lemley offers his opinion in this recent blog.
Building a foundation for source-to-pay
27 - 01 - 2020
It wasn’t too long ago that a colleague of mine suggested that the worst thing an organization could do (when building up their source-to-pay) was to focus on the low-hanging fruit
An Interview With Dirk Fischbach - Source-to-Pay in 2019, a Review
19 - 11 - 2019
We recently had the opportunity to catch up with one of the busiest guys at OpusCapita, Dirk Fischbach. Dirk is the Head of Procurement & Invoice Automation at OpusCapita.
Other content you might be interested in:
Indirect Procurement: 2017 Market Report
Indirect procurement lags behind the efficiencies gained by other financial processes. This report reveals the greatest gaps - and opportunities.
E-procurement Today - What’s Working and What’s Not
on demandAn interview with Yaron Nadbornik Head of Procurement at SATO. We also discuss the recent findings from the Trends in Indirect Procurement Research 2017 Report.